Do we really need Microsoft?

¬ February 28, 2005 - 12:00pm.

Keeping this item in mind, picture the turmoil Microsoft could cause by doing the same thing to the U.S. and the rest of the world.

Picture Microsoft shutting its doors, forever, and never answering another support call or putting out another update for its software.
What would the world do?

All those systems reliant on Windows, all those corporations reliant on the Office suite - sure, the economy would recover eventually, but just how much of an impact could the closing of Microsoft cause?

I'm not trying to incite some sort of paranoia-fed conspiracy theories, but just think about it. A lot of Linux advocates dream of a day when Microsoft no longer exists, but do they really know what they're asking for?
Do they really think Linux is at the level now to completely replace Windows in every setting/industry? Would I really want to be using the GIMP for magazine layouts if I was the editor of Rolling Stone?
I use and have used Linux for almost 7 years now, and in that time there has been some beautiful progression - but come on, all the in-fighting and forking of forks isn't conducive to gaining market share.

Linux as a collective may be spreading itself a little thin... instead of having many different distributions offering many different advantages over the other, when will there be one single distribution offering the best features of all of them?
Redhat was wise to offer different versions of its Linux system, depending on its purpose (personal workstation, enterprise server, etc.) - but that concept is nothing new when you consider Windows NT was first offered in 1993.

Granted, there is Apple - and as a Mac user myself I can feel confident in saying I'd choose a Mac over a PC when it comes to almost any task.

But how many bank machines do you see resembling an iMac?. You can't really just take MacOSX and install it on any old system, embedded or otherwise.

With all the competition lined up against Windows, there isn't really one direct competitor who would be capable of stepping into Microsoft's shoes and dominating the market. That being said, would the feeding frenzy of competition in the aftermath be such a bad thing?

If Microsoft closed its doors today, would the competition be ready to step up?

This is all speculation and I'm more or less curious myself about this. Let me be clear that I'm not an economics majour, and I definitely don't know everything about anything (except maybe Seinfeld).

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.
PARTY POKER BONUS CODES (trackback) (not verified) Says:
September 1, 2005 - 10:10pm

You are invited to take a look at some relevant information on bonus code poker party

Texas Holdem Strategy (trackback) (not verified) Says:
August 31, 2005 - 9:04pm

Please check out the sites dedicated to play free texas holdem

Texas Holdem Strategy (trackback) (not verified) Says:
August 31, 2005 - 9:04pm

Please check out the sites dedicated to play free texas holdem

Ibbo-Fez (not verified) Says:
March 1, 2005 - 4:56pm

Mac would rule the world if that happened and Apple is already working on a version to work on the x86 systems. So, in my personal opinion Apple is already on its way to competing with Microsoft. I have heard rumors that the new OS is already being run and tested on X86 systems so just give it time. And I agree that there isn't anything that Windows offers that a Mac can't handle if not better.

NoAnimalFlesh (not verified) Says:
March 1, 2005 - 11:17am

Apple could take over if MS fell. I don't see MS ever silently fading away. Balmer and Gates aren't just going to say "Computers are boring. Let's close shop and go build model railroads for a living."

But if Apple saw MS go away they would have to return to licensing their OS to other hardware vendors so it could run on all kinds of hardware (x86 mostly) and Apple would evolve into a software company and be able to redirect their focus on software. Rumors of Star Trek Next Generation or Marklar or whatever continue to float around that Apple is always secretly working on an x86 port of OS X. If it's true then they are set to move.

As far as embedded devices go they have the iPod's OS (Pixio, I think?) and Mac OS X can be stripped down to a much more basic level for all kidns fo devices. It does a great job running the cash registers at the Apple store. If Apple did become a software company there would be lots of fields for it to grow into.

Apple has had a lot of great ideas lately. They do not seek to create new products or services, but just to reinnovate the things they see so they JUST WORK. With them at the helm of software development for most of the world they would create a more integrated and user-friendly computing experience for all.

Patrick (not verified) Says:
March 1, 2005 - 10:49am

If Microsoft closed it's doors, we would see a gold rush for the race as the new OS. Mac's major problem is that their software would need to run on the hardware people already had. If they wrote their system such that it could be available on the open hardware, then they'd probably ascend to the throne. But Linux distros supported by corporations would also find a sudden surge in funding and they would race to solidify and make user friendly as quickly as possible.

It would be the dot-com burst all over again because this wouldn't be a chance for a garage company, except for them to be bought out by a corporate megalith. People would dream of writing the next OS and many would try, college students would stream into start ups to be the next big OS and then when someone finally broke the surface and the people began buying their system, they would find a sudden vacuum as the companies closed and folded and were bought out.

Then of course there is another option.

The shift to online operating apps would be given a jump start. Google and Yahoo may race to put everything you need online. And the OS may simply begin to fade. Google could publish a system which would allow boot up and immediately on boot up connect to the Internet and open their remote OS. This of course would rely on reliable internet and fast connections.

But we're just hypothesizing here.

deerhunter (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 9:39pm

I don't understand how linux users keep hating windows or microsoft. Say whatever you want to say about windows and how it sux and whatnot, but they're still the best fit for the contemporary user. The only reason why people brag about linux being so great is because they want to show off their knowledge of linux.

Anonymous (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 9:31pm

If the author thinks the publishing world would fold w/o Microsoft, then he knows even less than he thinks he does.

Most magazine layout and production is still done on Macs. In fact the only Windows machines in the newspaper where I worked were either servers, or used by the accountant and sales people.

Photoshop ran on the Mac way before there was a Windows version, and the Mac would keep most creative businesses (music, tv, ad agencies, movies) humming right along fine without Windows.

travis Says:
February 28, 2005 - 10:22pm

notice how I mentioned Mac right after that bit about Rolling Stone Magazine.

And if you think I was saying that Apple would fill Windows shoes should Microsoft's era end, than you know less than you think you do... Apple would thrive in the publishing and media industry but how would they do with the embedded market?

Thanks though.

Chupster811 (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 9:13pm

I really don't understand why everyone hates Microsoft? Security? Microsoft fixes the issues fast with automatic patches (SP2, Windows Update). I mean, they've made it easier and easier to get updates. And think of every computer in the world that was running Windows.....running Mac OS X or Linux! That is a frightening thought. Also, think about the enormous amount of software there is available for Windows...and then compare it to Linux and Mac OS X. I'm no fanboy or anything...I'm just wondering why everyone hates Microsoft.

pain (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 9:11pm

Microsoft for past few years really sets the standard for usability, to the extend that some Linux distro try to imitate Windows in its ease of use (Lindows/Linspire). Being a Linux user myself, I agree with the author that we need a single Linux distro, and really good softwares. And, if Microsoft closes its door now, I would say people will choose MacOSX over Linux.

Anonymous (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 8:48pm

i think people will still use windows for a few years or so after words but i also think another company will take over as microsoft and make up dates a and soon make a os simeler to windows and the old people will be happy again

Anonymous (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 8:47pm

if m$ was gone then who would keep the ignorant entertaind while I made my money off them

"The Next Bill Gates" (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 8:38pm

If Microsoft closed its doors today, would the competition be ready to step up?
Yes, the competition would step up and show people what real software should perform like.
Soon a company will rise up and pave the way for all Linux distros to come and M$FT will be no2. I believe do you?

Anonymous (not verified) Says:
February 28, 2005 - 1:41pm

Sure we need microsoft. The world would crash without them.

Mu-Sly (not verified) Says:
March 1, 2005 - 4:57am

Microsoft software does a pretty good job of crashing all over the world already...